[OE-core] Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5

[Iorga, Cristian]

Hi Saul, Ross,

I think that for the time being libasound-module-bluez should be libasound-module-bluez5.
We will get back to it after 1.5, when all components will be ready for BlueZ 5.
On the second issue, can you please go into details? I am not following exactly.
Regards,
Cristian

-----Original Message-----
From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:24 PM
To: 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'; Iorga, Cristian; Burton, Ross
Subject: Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5



Cristi, Ross:

There is currently a PREFERRED_PROVIDER issue with bluez4 and bluez5 and I am beginning to think we need to distinguish the libasound-module-bluez with libasound-module-bluez5.

I am also seeing some areas where we might need a virtual/bluez to allow recipes to enable features in places like connman and ofono

Thoughts?



-- 
     Sau!

Saul Wold
Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
Yocto Project / Poky Build System