[OE-core] RFC: meta-ro-rootfs approach and volatiles vs tmpfiles.d

[Chris Larson]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, ChenQi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com> wrote:

> You can get more information from the bug link below. The related bugs are
> listed in the blocks list of this bug.
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4103
> You can also review the patchset for these bugs on
>
> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=ChenQi/read-only-rootfs-in-live-images
>
>
I'll start playing around with this locally, to see how well it'd work
(with adjustments to support systemd) for our use cases, and will go from
there on our end. Up next for me:

- see if your r/o bits will be suitable for us with systemd rather than
using our tmpfiles override mechanism. we need to support this on much more
than just live images, and we need systemd :)
- pursue systemd support for services missing that support in oe-core
- pursue improved sysvinit / systemd feature parity, and potential
volatiles -> tmpfiles migration / consolidation
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20130730/5a8d7bae/attachment-0002.html>