[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] package_ipk.bbclass: make DESCRIPTION support newline

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Wed Jun 19 09:49:20 UTC 2013


On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 11:29 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:00:40AM -0400, Robert Yang wrote:
> > The recipe's DESCRIPTION is wrapped automatically by textwrap, make it
> > support newline ("\n") to let the user can wrap it manually, e.g.:
> > 
> > DESCRIPTION = "Foo1\nFoo2"
> > 
> > In the past, it would be:
> > Foo1\nFoo2
> > 
> > Now:
> > Foo1
> > Foo2
> > 
> > [YOCTO #4348]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang at windriver.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass |    5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> > index 55628e4..e67f641 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> > @@ -304,10 +304,11 @@ python do_package_ipk () {
> >                  # Special behavior for description...
> >                  if 'DESCRIPTION' in fs:
> >                      summary = localdata.getVar('SUMMARY', True) or localdata.getVar('DESCRIPTION', True) or "."
> > +                    ctrlfile.write('Description: %s\n' % summary)
> >                      description = localdata.getVar('DESCRIPTION', True) or "."
> >                      description = textwrap.dedent(description).strip()
> > -                    ctrlfile.write('Description: %s\n' % summary)
> > -                    ctrlfile.write('%s\n' % textwrap.fill(description, width=74, initial_indent=' ', subsequent_indent=' '))
> > +                    for t in description.split('\\n'):
> > +                        ctrlfile.write('%s\n' % textwrap.fill(t, width=74, initial_indent=' ', subsequent_indent=' '))
> >                  else:
> 
> Isn't DESCRIPTION supposed to be short oneline and longer multiline only
> in SUMMARY?

No, SUMMARY is meant to be the short oneline and DESCRIPTION is the
multiline one afaik...

Cheers,

Richard

> is opkg-utils (package-index) working with this? Newlines in SUMMARY
> were causing incorrect parsing and not using cache IIRC, not sure if the
> fix for that was generic enough to cover DESCRIPTION.
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core





More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list