[OE-core] [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: consider postinstall dependencies too

[Martin Jansa]

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:12AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:51 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > Shouldn't this list be defined in layer.conf like
> > SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE, so that other layers can extend that
> > list?
> 
> I'm hoping we only have very small list of these problematic
> dependencies. If we end up with a large number of them then yes, we'd
> need to abstract it but I'd prefer to avoid that unless proven
> necessary.
> 
> Is there a specific case you have in mind?

Isn't systemd-systemctl-native another candidate to be included?

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20130304/3a20f01c/attachment-0002.sig>