[OE-core] [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: consider postinstall dependencies too

[Martin Jansa]

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:38:33PM +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/04/2013 01:13 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:12AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:51 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> Shouldn't this list be defined in layer.conf like
> >>> SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE, so that other layers can extend that
> >>> list?
> >>
> >> I'm hoping we only have very small list of these problematic
> >> dependencies. If we end up with a large number of them then yes, we'd
> >> need to abstract it but I'd prefer to avoid that unless proven
> >> necessary.
> >>
> >> Is there a specific case you have in mind?
> > 
> > Isn't systemd-systemctl-native another candidate to be included?
> > 
> It looks like it should be in the list... I'll resend a new version.

what about all u-a-native implementations?

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20130304/f34cc0f1/attachment-0002.sig>