[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] systemd: Package hwdb data

[Koen Kooi]

Op 10 mrt. 2013, om 00:54 heeft Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:

> Create a new package to hold the hwdb.d
> Fixes the packaging warning as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb |    4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb
> index 381a67b..9fc4704 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ python populate_packages_prepend (){
> }
> PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += "^lib(udev|gudev|systemd).*"
> 
> -PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-gui ${PN}-vconsole-setup ${PN}-initramfs ${PN}-analyze"
> +PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-gui ${PN}-vconsole-setup ${PN}-initramfs ${PN}-analyze ${PN}-hwdb"
> 
> USERADD_PACKAGES = "${PN}"
> GROUPADD_PARAM_${PN} = "-r lock"
> @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ FILES_${PN} = " ${base_bindir}/* \
>                 /lib/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules \
>                "
> 
> +FILES_${PN}-hwdb = "/lib/udev/hwdb.d"
> +

It's a udev hwdb, so calling it systemd-hwdb would be very misleading. And aren't you missing a RRECOMMENDS?