[OE-core] [PATCH] coreutils: disable ACL as we do not depend on it

[Paul Eggleton]

On Friday 22 March 2013 14:53:43 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Coreutils does not depend on ACL but also does not disable it. Effect is
> that from time to time I have a copy in sstate-cache which got built
> 
> with ACL and then I have problem while building images or sdk:
> | Collected errors:
> |  * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for
> |  packagegroup-core-standalone-hhvm-sdk-target: *    libacl1 (>= 2.2.51) *
> |  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package
> |  packagegroup-core-standalone-hhvm-sdk-target.
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz at linaro.org>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.14.bb | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.14.bb
> b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.14.bb index 04c9eb2..71c4cdf
> 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.14.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.14.bb
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/coreutils/${BP}.tar.xz \
>  SRC_URI[md5sum] = "bcb135ce553493a45aba01b39eb3920a"
>  SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "0d120817c19292edb19e92ae6b8eac9020e03d51e0af9cb116cf82b65d18b02d"
> 
> +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-acl"
>  EXTRA_OECONF_class-native = "--without-gmp"
> 
>  # [ df mktemp base64 gets a special treatment and is not included in this

Presumably the "acl" recipe will no longer work if this is done... ?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre