[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] classes/buildhistory: implement history collection for SDKs

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 19:53 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> SDKs are constructed in a similar manner to images, and the contents can
> be influenced by a number of different factors, thus tracking the
> contents of produced SDKs when buildhistory is enabled can help detect
> the same kinds of issues as with images.
> 
> This required adding POPULATE_SDK_POST_HOST_COMMAND and
> SDK_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND variables so that data collection functions can
> be injected at the appropriate points in the SDK construction process,
> as well as moving the list_installed_packages and
> rootfs_list_installed_depends functions from the rootfs_{rpm,ipk,deb} to
> the package_{rpm,ipk,deb} classes so they can also be called during
> do_populate_sdk as well as do_rootfs.
> 
> Implements [YOCTO #3964].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass      |  130 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass       |   28 +++++++
>  meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass       |   24 ++++++
>  meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass       |   17 +++++
>  meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass |    2 +
>  meta/classes/populate_sdk_deb.bbclass  |    1 +
>  meta/classes/populate_sdk_ipk.bbclass  |    2 +
>  meta/classes/populate_sdk_rpm.bbclass  |    1 +
>  meta/classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass        |   27 -------
>  meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass        |   22 ------
>  meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass        |   16 ----
>  11 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)

This broke all the builds. Try setting PACKAGE_CLASSES with multiple
entries. The order determines the exact breakage. The first class
inherited needs to "win" but with the overlapping function names, this
isn't the case.

Cheers,

Richard