[OE-core] [PATCH/v2 3/3] core-image-sato: add udev-extraconf

[Saul Wold]

On 05/02/2013 09:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 12:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 04/30/2013 05:30 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>> as discussed in [1-2]
>>>
>>> [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-April/039025.html
>>> [2] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-April/039027.html
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb |    2 +-
>>>    1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb
>>> index e3246d2..76abb17 100644
>>> --- a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb
>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb
>>> @@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ LICENSE = "MIT"
>>>
>>>    inherit core-image
>>>
>>> -IMAGE_INSTALL += "packagegroup-core-x11-sato-games"
>>> +IMAGE_INSTALL += "packagegroup-core-x11-sato-games udev-extraconf"
>>>
>>
>> I believe that we should also have the udev-extraconf added to the
>> core-image-lsb, I will add a follow-on patch for that.
>
> I'll take changes removing the core dependency however I think one of
> the packagegroups ideally needs this addition, not such which one
> though.
>

After looking at this again, I think it might be more complex, do we 
want the extraconf files unconditionally in for both sysvinit and 
systemd?  There are 2 packagegroups where it would make sense to have 
them for sysvinit based system to have similar behavior as before 
systemd:  packagegroup-core-basic (which feeds the lsb images) and 
packagegroup-core-x11-sato.  It may need to be anonymous code that 
checks for systemd as the udev provider.

Thoughts?

Sau!

> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>