[OE-core] should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too)

[Joe MacDonald]

[[OE-core] should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too)] On 13.05.16 (Thu 14:56) Jesse Zhang wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We've accumulated quite a few perl modules and would like to contribute
> some/all of them to oe-core. But I think we'd better ask how everyone
> thinks before doing so, since the number of the modules are pretty
> large, and the policy may as well apply to python/ruby packages.
> 
> Most of the modules are simple cpan recipes. They are easy to maintain,
> but do consume *some* manpower.
> 
> I think there are a few alternatives.
> 
> 1. decide on each module on a case-by-case basis.
> 
> 2. keep all of them in some special layer other than oe-core.
> 
> 3. everyone maintain what they need in-house.

Have you considered the possibility of a meta-perl or meta-cpan layer in
meta-openembedded?  It was the first thing that occurred to me and I see
both Phil and Richard making pretty similar suggestions.  There's
already a meta-ruby layer there and it may also help address some of the
perl dependency problems that crop up in recipes in meta-Openembedded.

-J.

> 
> None of them seems perfect. Is there already some policy?
> 
> jesse
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20130516/412ce3f9/attachment-0001.sig>