[OE-core] [PATCH] bluez: declaration of virtual/bluez

[Burton, Ross]

On 31 October 2013 12:14, Rongqing Li <rongqing.li at windriver.com> wrote:
> connman can detect whether Bluez 4.x or Bluez 5.x is running, so both
> versions are ok for it.
>
> I think all packages should have the capability to detect which bluez
> version is used.

Whereas the GNOME platform has (last time I looked) mandated BlueZ 5
and deleted all BlueZ 4 code.

BlueZ choice is very much one or other, and you can't expect all
upstreams to maintain support for both for a long period of time.

Ross