[OE-core] [PATCH V2 0/5] fix WARNING: QA Issue on kmod/udev/nfs-utils (unsafe references [/ references to /usr/lib])

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 09:48 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 17:56 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> >> Change in V2: The fourth patch fixed the QA Issue on udev, it was missed on previous version.
> >>
> >> //Hongxu
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit f3541226b8b1187e79dec0f6f9f3c58cedf9ac9b:
> >>
> >>   bitbake: hob: do not display the "Package list may be incomplete!" dialog (2013-11-01 17:59:31 +0000)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >>   git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib hongxu/fix-qa-issue
> >>   http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=hongxu/fix-qa-issue
> >>
> >> Hongxu Jia (5):
> >>   insane.bbclass: support to skip  unsafe references in binaries qa
> >>     check.
> >>   kmod: fix QA issue
> >>   udev: fix  QA issue
> >>   udev: fix QA issue
> >>   nfs-utils: fix QA issue
> >
> > Last time these warnings came up I asked for a clear plan about what
> > needed to live in / and what needed to live in /usr and how we were
> > going to fix things once and for all (or forget this idea).
> >
> > Where is the plan? Why is it ok to just ignore these particular
> > warnings?
> 
> I don't think supporting /bin and /sbin separated than /usr is worth the work.

I keep hearing that some people do need this. I'm not against it in
principle, equally I do want to see a plan and/or complete patchset
before we take more patches for it.

Cheers,

Richard