[OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: Fix QA warnings about ALTERNATIVES

Lu Chong Chong.Lu at windriver.com
Wed Nov 13 10:19:39 UTC 2013


Hi, Richard

I will resend another commit, please ignore this one.
I'm very sorry.

Best Regards
Chong

On 11/13/2013 06:10 PM, Robert Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 11/13/2013 05:10 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 16:11 +0800, Chong.Lu at windriver.com wrote:
>>> From: Lu Chong <Chong.Lu at windriver.com>
>>>
>>> Previously, EXTRA_OECONF would be overwritten by 
>>> EXTRA_OECONF_class-native
>>> and EXTRA_OECONF_class-nativesdk when we executed `make export-sdk' 
>>> command.
>>
>> We don't have an export-sdk command do we?
>>
>
> Hi RP,
>
> Sorry, "make export-sdk" is a wrlinux command, which is equivlant to
> do_populate_sdk, Chong is a new guy, sorry for the confusion:-)
>
> // Robert
>
>>> As a result, some applications such as `last', `mesg' and `reset' 
>>> didn't get
>>> compiled.
>>>
>>> The patch rewrote EXTRA_OECONF_class-native and 
>>> EXTRA_OECONF_class-nativesdk
>>> variables to fix QA warnings.
>>>
>>> usr/share/man/man1/last.1.util-linux does not exist
>>> usr/share/man/man1/mesg.1.util-linux does not exist
>>> usr/bin/last.util-linux does not exist
>>> usr/bin/mesg.util-linux does not exist
>>> bin/reset does not exist
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Chong <Chong.Lu at windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>   meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.23.2.bb |   22 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.23.2.bb 
>>> b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.23.2.bb
>>> index b5c221b..b9cdc61 100644
>>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.23.2.bb
>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.23.2.bb
>>> @@ -18,5 +18,23 @@ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "39a02ad0b3b37824c394f40930b7aa38"
>>>   SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
>>> "6c5be3f7beec91b4893de14bbd722886fa2521be5bfa0fc079b749d0018633b1"
>>>
>>>   CACHED_CONFIGUREVARS += "scanf_cv_alloc_modifier=as"
>>> -EXTRA_OECONF_class-native += "--disable-fallocate 
>>> --disable-use-tty-group"
>>> -EXTRA_OECONF_class-nativesdk += "--disable-fallocate 
>>> --disable-use-tty-group"
>>> +EXTRA_OECONF_class-native = "--disable-use-tty-group \
>>> +                             --disable-makeinstall-chown 
>>> --enable-elvtune --enable-init \
>>> +                             --enable-kill --enable-last 
>>> --enable-mesg --enable-partx \
>>> +                             --enable-raw --enable-rdev 
>>> --enable-reset --disable-login \
>>> +                             --disable-vipw --disable-newgrp 
>>> --disable-chfn-chsh \
>>> +                             --enable-write --enable-arch 
>>> --enable-mount --with-fsprobe=builtin \
>>> +                             --enable-libuuid --enable-libblkid 
>>> --enable-fsck --without-udev \
>>> +                             usrsbin_execdir='${sbindir}' \
>>> +                             --disable-fallocate 
>>> --disable-use-tty-group \
>>> +"
>>> +EXTRA_OECONF_class-nativesdk = "--disable-use-tty-group \
>>> +                                --disable-makeinstall-chown 
>>> --enable-elvtune --enable-init \
>>> +                                --enable-kill --enable-last 
>>> --enable-mesg --enable-partx \
>>> +                                --enable-raw --enable-rdev 
>>> --enable-reset --disable-login \
>>> +                                --disable-vipw --disable-newgrp 
>>> --disable-chfn-chsh \
>>> +                                --enable-write --enable-arch 
>>> --enable-mount --with-fsprobe=builtin \
>>> +                                --enable-libuuid --enable-libblkid 
>>> --enable-fsck --without-udev \
>>> +                                usrsbin_execdir='${sbindir}' \
>>> +                                --disable-fallocate 
>>> --disable-use-tty-group \
>>> +"
>>
>> We are not duplicating EXTRA_OECONF like that, its horrible. How about
>> something like:
>>
>> EXTRA_OECONF = "xxxx ${SOMEVAR}"
>> SOMEVAR = "z"
>> SOMEVAR_class-native = "x"
>> SOMEVAR_class-nativesdk = "y"
>>
>> ? I'm having to guess at what your real problem is though as the commit
>> message doesn't contain the right information.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>
>




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list