[OE-core] [RFC][PATCH 3/4] package.bbclass: add SHLIBSSEARCHDIRS to define where to search for shlib providers
Richard Purdie
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Mon Sep 2 11:22:18 UTC 2013
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 01:13 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * when package contains some files matching "^.*\.so", but in directory
> not default linker search paths (e.g. /opt/package/bundled-lib/libfoo.so)
> don't register it as libfoo provider, because it's possible that there
> is different package providing libfoo.so in ${libdir} and that would
> be better shlib provider for other packages to depend on
> * recipes providing libs intentionally in some other directory can
> define own SHLIBSSEARCHDIRS value
>
> [YOCTO #4628]
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/package.bbclass | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> index 6c3ca56..3713fd3 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> @@ -1307,6 +1307,9 @@ SHLIBSDIRS = "${@getshlibsdirs(d)}"
> SHLIBSDIR = "${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/${PACKAGE_ARCH}${TARGET_VENDOR}-${TARGET_OS}/shlibs"
> SHLIBSWORKDIR = "${PKGDESTWORK}/shlibs"
>
> +# default search path when searching for shlibs provided by package
> +SHLIBSSEARCHDIRS ?= "${baselib} ${libdir}"
> +
> python package_do_shlibs() {
> import re, pipes
Did you end up setting SHLIBSSEARCHDIRS for many recipes out of
interest?
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list