[OE-core] u-boot-fw-utils -> u-boot-fw-utils-cross
Otavio Salvador
otavio at ossystems.com.br
Fri Sep 13 18:35:16 UTC 2013
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Hans Beckerus <hans.beckerus at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2013-09-13 7:32, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Anders Darander <anders at chargestorm.se>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As I've started to bring our internal distro and machines up to the
>>> lates oe-core, I've got some issues with the u-boot-fw-utils to
>>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross transition.
>>
>> Right.
>>
>>> In my old branch, I used u-boot-fw-utils_2011.06. This used to compile
>>> and package fw_printenv(setenv) just fine.
>>>
>>> In the new, u-boot-fw-utils-cross_2013.07.bb, fw_printenv is now built
>>> using HOSTCC instead of the cross-compiler. The old recipe used to
>>> include:
>>> EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'HOSTCC="${CC}"'
>>> as u-boot defaults to build everything under tools/ using HOSTC.
>>
>> Yes; this is intended to be used in the host. I can add support for
>> use in target as well (or help you to do it).
>
> Honestly I do not understand this change at all? fw_printenv typically
> *always* executes on the target since it dumps the contents of the U-boot
> environment from a shell. Why would you want to build it for the host? That
> does not make sense. Unless host is the same as your target which I doubt
> could be considered the normal case, or?
It depends on how do you intend to use this. It can be used to mangle
environment during image processing.
I will cook a patch and send for testing, so we get target ones back.
Regards,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list