[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] x-load: fix broken beaglebone support and FILEPATHS usage

[Koen Kooi]

Op 26 apr. 2014, om 20:39 heeft petter at technux.se het volgende geschreven:

> 2014-04-26 15:10 skrev Gary Thomas:
> 
>> On 2014-04-25 16:11, Petter Mabäcker wrote:
>> 
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> c446d4edca3b4edfcdee48247391bfb306aab4c2: default-distrovars.inc: Add
>>> libgcc-initial to the GPLv3 whitelist (same as libgcc) (2014-04-25
>>> 18:00:38 +0100) are available in the git repository at:
>>> git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib petmab/fix_xload
>>> 
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=petmab/fix_xload
>>> [1] Petter Mabäcker (2): x-load: fix broken beaglebone support x-load:
>>> remove usage of FILESPATH .../x-load/x-load-git/beagleboard/name.patch
>>> | 18 ---------- .../0001-Change-omap3530beagle-target-name.patch | 37
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load_git.bb | 6 ++-- 3
>>> files changed, 39 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load-git/beagleboard/name.patch create mode
>>> 100644
>>> 
>> 
> meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load/beaglebone/0001-Change-omap3530beagle-target-name.patch
>> 
>> These changes don't seem quite correct since the beagleboard
>> wasn't renamed to be beaglebone - they are separate entities
>> and there are still beagleboard(s) out there (supported by
>> meta-ti)
>> 
>> At most, your changes should simply add support for beaglebone,
>> not remove support for beagleboard.
>> 
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
>> MLB Associates | Embedded world
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your input. Beagleboard is not longer supported in YP. See: Yocto Bug #2444, that results in for example:
> 
> 9680453 yocto-project-qs: Substituting Beaglebone for Beagleboard.
> and
> 7254dfb Drop beagleboard, replaced by beaglebone
> 
> And usage of meta-ti layer to build beagleboard will override the x-load version within meta layer (from oe) anyway (seehttp://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/tree/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load_git.bb). So my opinion is that it's correct to replace beagleboard with beaglebone in this commit. But if you have any other opinion, please let me know and I will of course consider them.
> 
> Anyone else who have any comments about this?

X-load shouldn't be used anymore, it has been superseded by u-boot SPL some years ago for all cortex based TI SoCs.