[OE-core] Merging problems

[Richard Purdie]

On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 11:27 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 21:04 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 2014-12-20 5:40 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 10:13 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > >> On 2014-12-20 6:15 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > >>> So where are we at?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks to some great help from Ross, we have a number of patches merged
> > >>> and many of the issues in my last email have been addressed. I'm
> > >>> continuing to struggle with the kernel series. The last build on the
> > >>> autobuilder highlighted that:
> > >>>
> > >>> * there are problems in boot-directdisk.bbclass (have a fix)
> > >>> * there is a do_rootfs/do_package_qa race (have a fix)
> > >>> * the report-error.bbclass tasks could crash (have a fix)
> > >>> * the kernelmodule sanity tests were failing (have a fix)
> > >>> * qemumips gdb is failing to compile, probably due to new kernel
> > >>>     headers (no fix as yet)
> > >>> * systemd sanity QA tests continue to fail on xorg and systemd-login
> > >>>     (no fix as yet)
> > >>> * there are continuing problems with linux-imx from meta-fsl-arm, I
> > >>>     thought these were addressed but clearly not :(
> > >>>
> > >>> Ideally I'd like to take some time off over the holidays but I can't see
> > >>> that happening until the patch queues are under some kind of control :(.
> > >>
> > >> Let me know if there are one of these that you want me to take. I'm all
> > >> for pitching in and getting everyone some down time.
> > >
> > > Looks like I spoke too soon:
> > >
> > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-x86/builds/132/steps/BuildImages_1/logs/stdio
> > 
> > Amazing how those race conditions pop out on the builders .. I probably
> > built this 100 times, and never managed to trigger these.
> 
> We also have one more:
> 
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-ppc/builds/134/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio
> 
> On target module building for ppc fails.
> 
> > > which seems to be a race over the kernel source directory. I'm guessing
> > > the file in question is a temporary build artefact of lttng-modules
> > > which was running at the same time? Any way we can avoid temp files in
> > > the kernel source dir?
> > 
> > Hmm. The modules should already have their output directory set to their
> > own source (not the kernel), so they really shouldn't be dropping down
> > any temp files.
> > 
> > I was only using the cpio method to copy the source since that is what
> > was already being used .. and it is a bit faster. The stat of the
> > files to the pipe is what is catching us here.
> > 
> > The question is .. do we really care ? A straight copy of the files wouldn't
> > be so sensitive to this, or we could explicitly exclude then in the
> > existing cpio pipe. That would buy some time to track down what is
> > touching down the tmp file in the kernel build process, and I can't see
> > how the dual use of that staged directory will cause us a problem on
> > the copied kernel source side (we do clean things up before packaging).
> 
> Well, I think we need to get to the bottom of this. I made some
> experiments. The best results were from hacking scripts/Kbuild.include
> where these .tmp files get created, I hacked it not to remove them.
> 
> When you do that, it becomes clear that do_make_scripts is the task
> which is causing the problem.
> 
> The world has changed since we last visited the scripts problem, we
> could move that task to the main kernel build now and have the modules
> and kernel-devsrc depend on it? The function in module.bbclass would
> then become a placeholder?

After a lot of trail and error I've sent out a couple of patches for the
above two issues. These fix the immediate problems however I think there
is more cleanup than needs to be done early next year.

I filed:

https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7095

since the overlap between kernel-dev and kernel-devsrc is problematic
and should get resolved. This may help resolve the powerpc problem in a
nicer way if devsrc is *just* the source and dev has some artefacts like
the build config. It may be we have a separate package for the artefacts
too, I'm open to ideas.

I did start to experiment with cleaning up the scripts handling in the
build tree:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rpurdie/t222&id=760fa19a11165ff02c5df38cc89335fc503afba2

I have mixed feelings about it that, we really do need to try and do
something about it though.

Cheers,

Richard