[OE-core] [PATCH 01/38] *-basic: rename to *-standardlinux

Paul Eggleton paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Mon Feb 24 16:38:39 UTC 2014


On Monday 30 December 2013 12:59:26 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 30 December 2013 09:35:18 Robert Yang wrote:
> > I'm afraid that the standardlinux maybe a little confused with
> > linuxstdbase, bu I don't have any better idea about it.
> 
> You could be right. I've thought for a long time about renaming this and
> haven't been able to come up with anything better. On the other hand, in our
> current configuration we are actually using the basic/standardlinux
> packagegroup as part of our LSB images; although that might not be the
> right thing to continue doing - LSB probably ought to be independent.
> 
> FWIW, let's consider this particular patch as RFC, maybe someone else has a
> better idea of what to name it. I am very much convinced that "basic" is not
> the right name though.

So, has anyone got any better ideas for the name of core-image-basic and 
packagegroup-core-basic?

The idea is that these are meant to contain things that you might have on a 
more traditional or full-featured Linux system. Somehow "-traditionallinux" 
doesn't really work either.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list