[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] pseudo_1.6.0.bb: uprev to pseudo 1.6
Peter Seebach
peter.seebach at windriver.com
Fri Jul 11 21:56:35 UTC 2014
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:32:49 +0100
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The issue is the lack of the xattr headers from what I saw, not the
> xattr support itself and we're missing what looks like a single define.
> For the complexity, I did wonder if we should ship a default...
Hmm. We could in theory add a test to the configure script for the header,
and just hard-code that value in a couple of places. I don't think we actually
need the header for much else. I don't know how stable that value is across
distros or anything, though. I assume it's pretty stable.
The main thing is that I've tried to avoid making dependencies on compile
checks like "can I compile something using this header" because those are
annoying and slow.
> Adding in the xattr-native dependency may well be easier than updating
> the docs on dependencies on all the different distros.
-s
--
Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified.
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list