[OE-core] [PATCH] update-rc.d: Allow to use different initscripts provider
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Tue Jun 17 12:53:03 UTC 2014
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:33:17PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Friday 06 June 2014 18:57:34 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > * until now all recipes were respecting VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts
> > variable but commit bba835fed88c3bd5bb5bd58962034aef57c408d8
> > hardcoded "initscripts" runtime dependency
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass index ca9486b..19b081d 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
> > @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> > UPDATERCPN ?= "${PN}"
> >
> > DEPENDS_append = " update-rc.d-native"
> > -DEPENDS_append_class-target = " initscripts"
> > +VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts ?= "initscripts"
> > +DEPENDS_append_class-target = " ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts}"
> > UPDATERCD = "update-rc.d"
> > UPDATERCD_class-cross = ""
> > UPDATERCD_class-native = ""
>
> Technically this isn't right either though - VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts is
> for the runtime package name not the recipe as is being added here. It just so
> happens that they are the same thing for initscripts.
Ah, you're right, I was blind when reading DEPENDS (I've even mentioned
runtime dependency in commit message :/), sorry.
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20140617/2bdc09b9/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list