[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] gnutls fixes for master

Paul Eggleton paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Wed Mar 5 13:24:30 UTC 2014


Hi David,

On Wednesday 05 March 2014 13:34:41 David Nyström wrote:
> On 2014-03-05 12:25, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Turns out we're using the same old version of gnutls in master as in
> > dylan and dora, and we need a fix for a compile failure.
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 
82c773e88aaefd9321481ad297554d5b4a3ae0b2:
> >    Revert "ncurses: use ln -r to generate relative symlink" (2014-03-03
> >    15:52:26 +0000)> 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >    git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib paule/gnutls
> >    http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=
> >    paule/gnutls> 
> > Karl Hiramoto (2):
> >    gnutls: CVE-2014-0092 correct return codes
> >    gnutls: Fixed bug that prevented the rejection of v1 intermediate CA
> >    
> >      certificates.
> > 
> > Paul Eggleton (1):
> >    gnutls: fix failure during do_compile
> 
> Any specific reasons why we still have the old gnuTLS-2.12.23 ?

I'm not sure - there's no NO_UPGRADE_REASON set in our inc files to suggest 
why. Googling turned this up:

 https://wiki.debian.org/gnutls3

Valentin, Saul - we probably ought to have NO_UPGRADE_REASON set for gnutls if 
we have a good reason for staying with 2.12.x.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list