[OE-core] [PATCH 0/7] systemd-211 upgrade and uclibc fixes

[Martin Jansa]

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:31:16AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 22:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Finally, managed to get systemd 211 to boot on uclibc and eglibc
> > on all supported qemu machines, this should fix bug #5940
> > 
> > Additional functionality in uclibc is needed to support this
> > systemd
> > 
> > gnutls, glib-2.0, intltool fixes are uclibc specific and are needed
> > to get uclibc images going
> > 
> > util-linux fix is moulded to support uclibc
> > 
> > I have been testing this fix on the qemuarm/qemuppc/qemumips/qemux86/qemux86-64
> > on both uclibc/eglibc images and its been working good.
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 58aae40bbf8edd9c5ca70b2094eeb724391f1993:
> > 
> >   eglibc: Update SRC_URI to point to final download location (2014-03-13 20:44:48 -0700)
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib kraj/systemd-211
> >   http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/systemd-211
> > 
> > Khem Raj (7):
> >   uclibc: Implement clock_adjtime()
> >   uclibc: Remove iconv.h
> >   gnutls: Link in pthread explicitly for uclibc
> >   glib-2.0: Fix localedir expectations for uclibc
> >   util-linux: scanf_cv_alloc_modifier changed from 'as' -> 'ms'
> >   intltool: Define DATADIRNAME=share for uclibc based systems
> >   Upgrade to systemd 211+
> 
> I tried this on the autobuilder, with and without the pulseaudio 4->5
> upgrade. The result was:
> 
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-qa-systemd/builds/111
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-qa-systemd/builds/112

Both links show pulseaudio/4.0 in error log and 4.0 needs something
like:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2014-February/089796.html

> so I'm afraid I can't take the systemd part of this series. Its getting
> late in the cycle for a pulseaudio 4->5 upgrade too :/
> 
> Does anyone have any strong opinions on this?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20140317/b3f3d090/attachment-0002.sig>