[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature

[Iorga, Cristian]

No, but I will.

But is this a negative point of the patch, or the autobuilder should be changed?
I acted upon some personal observations, a discussion with Paul (he suggested the change) and also on this guide:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/LSB_Result (in which distro is set to poky-lsb).

Regards,
Cristian

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:58 PM
To: Iorga, Cristian
Cc: openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature

On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote:
> core-image-lsb only gave a warning:
> "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, PAM 
> won't work correctly"
> when the proper DISTRO was not set for it.
> default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", but not necessarily, 
> depending on each custom distro.
> 
> This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam as a distro feature for 
> core-image-lsb by giving an error instead of just a warning.
> 
> Fixes [YOCTO #6073]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga at intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
> index ed316a6..ab61c6e 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
> @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\
>      packagegroup-core-lsb \
>      "
>  
> -inherit core-image
> +inherit core-image distro_features_check
> +
> +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam"


I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked?

Cheers,

Richard