[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature

[Burton, Ross]

On 31 March 2014 18:03, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I kind of disagree with that, the LSB image can take into account
> configuration in other parts of the system. If pam isn't configured, I'm
> not sure that should automatically make it completely unbuildable...

An image that claims to be LSB compliant but due to
not-immediately-obvious DISTRO_FEATURES isn't actually doesn't seem
like a good idea to me, fwiw.  If the LSB image requires PAM, X11 and
so on then it should require the features.

Ross