[OE-core] [daisy-backport][PATCH 0/6] Daisy backports

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Thu May 22 19:15:23 UTC 2014


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:56:40PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> (Adding Denys in Cc)
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On 05/22/2014 11:27 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Those are the changes I have in my local backport branch which I run
>> >> on top of 'sgw/daisy' branch.
>> >>
>> >> Chen Qi (2):
>> >>    tcf-agent: add systemd support
>> >>    gdb: add PACKAGECONFIG for babeltrace
>> >>
>> > These are already in my branch
>>
>> Good.
>>
>> >> Denys Dmytriyenko (3):
>> >>    cryptodev-linux: move to recipes-kernel to be shared with module and
>> >>      tests
>> >>    cryptodev-linux: create common .inc file to be shared by module and
>> >>      tests
>> >>    cryptodev-tests: recipe for cryptodev test suite based on OpenSSL
>> >>
>> > I have pulled these for testing, but we don't normally enable new
>> > functionality in point releases.  I would like to get a clear justification
>> > as to why these are needed to be back-ported.
>> >
>> > Please provide more details on the cryptodev functionality and why it should
>> > be backported.
>>
>> We need those to use crypto support in some SoC as is the case for
>> Freescale (in meta-fsl-arm) and TI (in meta-ti). Unfortunately this
>> has been sent late in the release but with the drop of ocf-linux it
>> makes sense to provide cryptodev in my opinion.
>>
>> Denys?
>
> Did you miss the 4th patch in the series adding the actual cryptodev-module?
>
> Otherwise I'd support this backport. ocf-linux was dropped before the release,
> but complete cryptodev replacement didn't make in time for the release and was
> added afterwards. The partial cryptodev support was for the header file only
> and assumed that the kernel had been patched with the rest of cryptodev device
> driver...

Oh, I think I dropped it during the rebase by mistake.

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=8e12e0ccf75749c682ac310c648166425a295b37

But Saul did include it in the branch :-)

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list