[OE-core] [PATCH] nfs-utils: Upgrade to 1.3.1

[Paul Eggleton]

On Wednesday 12 November 2014 11:16:38 Saul Wold wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 10:50 AM, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
> > Removed: fix-a-Gcc-undefined-behavior.patch - Upstream
> > 
> > Removed: 0001-statd-fixed-the-with-statdpath-flag.patch - Upstream
> > 
> > Removed: fix-the-start-statd.patch - Different solution on upstream
> > 
> > Removed: nfs-utils-1.0.6-uclibc.patch - Different solution on upstream
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez <alejandro.hernandez at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >   .../files/fix-a-Gcc-undefined-behavior.patch       |  38 -------
> >   .../0001-statd-fixed-the-with-statdpath-flag.patch |  41 --------
> >   .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils/fix-the-start-statd.patch  |  30 ------
> >   .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils-1.0.6-uclibc.patch         |  27 -----
> >   .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.3.0.bb                   | 115
> >   --------------------- .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.3.1.bb                 
> >    | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Did you use git mv?  or pass the -M to send-email since that correctly
> do renames.

It would be -M when using send-email (or format-patch). git mv doesn't 
actually do anything different than a separate git add followed by git rm.

FWIW, the scripts/create-pull-request & send-pull-request script already 
specify -M (among other things), so although a pull request isn't all that 
useful with a single patch, I tend to use it anyway.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre