[OE-core] Why does building an image for machine X delete the bootloader for machine Y?
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 26 11:31:49 UTC 2014
Hi Mike,
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 09:19:13 Mike Looijmans wrote:
> I do a:
>
> MACHINE=X bitbake my-image
>
> This DEPENDS on a virtual bootloader, which will produce a BOOT.BIN file in
> the deploy directory, which is tmp-glibc/deploy.images/X/
>
> If I then do a:
>
> MACHINE=Y bitbake my-image
>
> the BOOT.BIN in tmp-glibc/deploy.images/X/ is suddenly gone!
>
> If i do a
>
> MACHINE=X bitbake my-image
>
> then the the BOOT.BIN in tmp-glibc/deploy.images/Y/ is suddenly gone, and
> the one for the X machine appears again. The bootloader recipe is not being
> rebuilt at all.
>
> The machines have the same MACHINE_ARCH, they differ on only minor points
> (the FPGA).
>
> What is going on here?
I can't be sure, but my guess is the recipe is not marked as being machine-
specific (i.e. PACKAGE_ARCH is not set to "${MACHINE_ARCH}" - is that the
case?) but there is still some variable dependency on a variable that has a
machine-specific value. If it's not obvious from the recipe, check if there are
two sets of tasks for the bootloader recipe in the sstate cache, and then use
bitbake-diffsigs to compare the sigdata/siginfo files.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list