[OE-core] isn't "do_install_append_pn-uclibc" partly redundant?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Oct 16 15:54:50 UTC 2014
perusing recipes for my courseware and ran across this in the listed
file:
meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc:do_install_append_pn-uclibc () {
now, given that the above file is clearly the general include file for
the uclibc package, could the task append definition:
do_install_append_pn-uclibc () {
not have been written more simply as:
do_install_append () {
as in, given that this task append is clearly only for the uclibc
package, it seems unnecessary to add a package-specific override. most
other recipes use the second, shorter form, so i was wondering if
there was something subtle about the uclibc recipe that necessitated
the first form.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list