[OE-core] isn't "do_install_append_pn-uclibc" partly redundant?

[Christopher Larson]

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>
wrote:

> meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc:do_install_append_pn-uclibc () {
>
> now, given that the above file is clearly the general include file for
> the uclibc package, could the task append definition:
>
>   do_install_append_pn-uclibc () {
>
> not have been written more simply as:
>
>   do_install_append () {
>
> as in, given that this task append is clearly only for the uclibc
> package, it seems unnecessary to add a package-specific override. most
> other recipes use the second, shorter form, so i was wondering if
> there was something subtle about the uclibc recipe that necessitated
> the first form.
>

uclibc.inc is included by both uclibc-initial and uclibc.
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20141016/b7ca2ca2/attachment-0002.html>