[OE-core] [PATCH 08/17] connman: Fix builds to compile on musl
Burton, Ross
ross.burton at intel.com
Mon Apr 13 13:50:44 UTC 2015
On 11 April 2015 at 02:20, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> ++#ifdef __GLIBC__
>
+ #include <execinfo.h>
>
As you're checking for this header at configure time wouldn't it be best to
use #ifdef HAVE_EXECINFO_H, just in case another C library adds it later?
+ /* from netinet/in.h */
>
++#if 0
> + struct in6_pktinfo {
> + struct in6_addr ipi6_addr; /* src/dst IPv6 address */
> + unsigned int ipi6_ifindex; /* send/recv interface index */
> + };
> ++#endif
>
#if 0? Is this entirely redundant code (in which case, delete it), or is
this disabling something?
> ++++ b/gweb/gresolv.c
> +@@ -876,8 +876,6 @@ GResolv *g_resolv_new(int index)
> + resolv->index = index;
> + resolv->nameserver_list = NULL;
> +
> +- res_ninit(&resolv->res);
> +-
> + return resolv;
> + }
> +
> +@@ -917,8 +915,6 @@ void g_resolv_unref(GResolv *resolv)
> +
> + flush_nameservers(resolv);
> +
> +- res_nclose(&resolv->res);
> +-
> + g_free(resolv);
> + }
>
Surely these should be checked at configure time or wrapped in GLIBC tests,
with the new codepath as a fallback. Ideally we can upstream most of this.
Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20150413/12f7c606/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list