[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] classes/package: clarify installed-vs-shipped message

[Paul Eggleton]

Based on the number of times I've had to explain it over the years it
seems that a lot of new users don't immediately realise what is meant
by "shipped" here (nor should we expect them to) so let's at least
mention packaging and briefly tell the user what they need to do. (I was
going to go into more detail in the message, but there is really more
detail than can be covered succinctly here.)

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com>
---
 meta/classes/package.bbclass | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
index 5558d0d..9790e9d 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
@@ -1132,12 +1132,13 @@ python populate_packages () {
                 unshipped.append(path)
 
     if unshipped != []:
-        msg = pn + ": Files/directories were installed but not shipped"
+        msg = pn + ": Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:"
         if "installed-vs-shipped" in (d.getVar('INSANE_SKIP_' + pn, True) or "").split():
             bb.note("Package %s skipping QA tests: installed-vs-shipped" % pn)
         else:
             for f in unshipped:
                 msg = msg + "\n  " + f
+            msg = msg + "\nPlease either set FILES such that these items are packaged, or alternatively delete them within do_install"
             package_qa_handle_error("installed-vs-shipped", msg, d)
 }
 populate_packages[dirs] = "${D}"
-- 
2.1.0