[OE-core] [PATCH] valgrind: update to 3.11.0

[Khem Raj]

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:07:48 Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Paul Eggleton
>> 
>> <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:28:59 Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>>>> On 12/15/2015 05:25 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>>>>> +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux'
>>>>>> +COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux'
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you add armv7ve as well?
>>>> 
>>>> Armv7ve support is not yet in master, so you'll have to add it later I'm
>>>> afraid.
>>> 
>>> I think by policy we don't have any restrictions on architecture-specific
>>> flags in OE-Core (at least, assuming they're reasonable).
>> 
>> If we're going to duplicate all _armv7a over-rides for _armv7ve then
>> I'd vote to do so in a single patch series which fixes up the whole of
>> oe-core rather than adding the over-rides one at a time amongst
>> version updates etc.
> 
> Makes sense, but before doing that would it make sense to have a grouping
> override for all of them that can be used instead (where appropriate)?
> 

stepping back a step. What so different about armv7ve that it needs to be a separate arch
its just virtual extensions on top of armv7a, so any override pertaining to armv7a should
be valid for it well. Can you work towards making it so ?

> Cheers,
> Paul
> 
> --
> 
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20151215/e548c58a/attachment-0002.sig>