[OE-core] [PATCH] devtools: add a bb for git-manpages

Paul Eggleton paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Tue Feb 3 09:45:37 UTC 2015


On Monday 02 February 2015 15:54:30 Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] devtools: add a bb for git-manpages] On 02/02/2015 
(Mon 17:04) Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Friday 30 January 2015 19:08:25 Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > These could be created from scratch from git itself, but it
> > > requires asciidoc, xsltproc, python bits and too much other
> > > baggage.  Since the git folks issue a tarball with the manpages
> > > for each release, it is simpler to just go get that.
> > 
> > I'm just wondering, would it be simpler to just do this as part of the git
> > recipe itself and have the manpages go into git-doc? Then you would get
> > the documentation automatically if you had git in your image and doc-pkgs
> > in IMAGE_FEATURES, plus we wouldn't have to remember to upgrade this every
> > time we upgraded the git recipe.
> 
> I'm sure we can do that if desired.  It is probably worth mentioning
> that I had this standalone recipe off in a layer for a while, and after
> discussions on how to deal with coreutils and the mess it creats with
> the openly hostile to cross-compile "help2man" that the idea of a
> separate bb for manpages appeared acceptable.  So, based on that, I
> figured it was time to post my git-manpages bb.

I just think if upstream ships pre-generated docs in lock-step with its code 
releases, we might as well fetch and package them up as part of the normal 
recipe and save ourselves some maintenance.
 
> This brings me back to coreutils -- should we source prebuilt manpages
> within the main recipe there too, or do a coreutils-manpages.bb  ?

The same applies there too I would think.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list