[OE-core] [PATCH v2]gcc: upgrade to 4.9.2 and fix the bug #6824
Lei Maohui
leimaohui at cn.fujitsu.com
Fri Jan 16 07:00:34 UTC 2015
The new patches 0060-Only-xxx and 0061-Fix-xxx aim to fix the bug in e500v2 as following:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908 .
Signed-off-by: Lei Maohui <leimaohui at cn.fujitsu.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9.inc | 12 +-
...e500-double-in-SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P-registers.patch | 33 ++++
.../0061-Fix-for-unwinder-aborts-on-e500.patch | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0060-Only-allow-e500-double-in-SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P-registers.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0061-Fix-for-unwinder-aborts-on-e500.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9.inc
index 2568e99..e0b291e 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9.inc
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ require gcc-common.inc
# Third digit in PV should be incremented after a minor release
-PV = "4.9.1"
+PV = "4.9.2"
# BINV should be incremented to a revision after a minor gcc release
-BINV = "4.9.1"
+BINV = "4.9.2"
FILESEXTRAPATHS =. "${FILE_DIRNAME}/gcc-4.9:"
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ SRC_URI = "\
file://0051-eabispe.patch \
file://0053-gcc-fix-segfault-from-calling-free-on-non-malloc-d-a.patch \
file://0054-gcc-Makefile.in-fix-parallel-building-failure.patch \
- file://0055-PR-rtl-optimization-61801.patch \
file://0056-top-level-reorder_gcc-bug-61144.patch \
- file://0057-aarch64-config.patch \
file://0058-gcc-r212171.patch \
file://0059-gcc-PR-rtl-optimization-63348.patch \
+ file://0060-Only-allow-e500-double-in-SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P-registers.patch \
+ file://0061-Fix-for-unwinder-aborts-on-e500.patch \
"
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "fddf71348546af523353bd43d34919c1"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "d334781a124ada6f38e63b545e2a3b8c2183049515a1abab6d513f109f1d717e"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4df8ee253b7f3863ad0b86359cd39c43"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "2020c98295856aa13fda0f2f3a4794490757fc24bcca918d52cc8b4917b972dd"
S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/gcc-${PV}"
B = "${WORKDIR}/gcc-${PV}/build.${HOST_SYS}.${TARGET_SYS}"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0060-Only-allow-e500-double-in-SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P-registers.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0060-Only-allow-e500-double-in-SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P-registers.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..44343bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0060-Only-allow-e500-double-in-SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P-registers.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+backport to fix the bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908 .
+
+2014-10-25 Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery.com>
+
+ * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_hard_regno_nregs_internal): Do
+ not allow e500 double in registers not satisyfing
+ SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P.
+
+git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@216688 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908]
+Note : This patch though presents in upstream trunk, have not been back-ported to gcc-4_9-branch.
+
+---
+ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+index e1a226c..eab0a49 100644
+--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
++++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+@@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ rs6000_hard_regno_nregs_internal (int regno, enum machine_mode mode)
+ SCmode so as to pass the value correctly in a pair of
+ registers. */
+ else if (TARGET_E500_DOUBLE && FLOAT_MODE_P (mode) && mode != SCmode
+- && !DECIMAL_FLOAT_MODE_P (mode))
++ && !DECIMAL_FLOAT_MODE_P (mode) && SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P (regno))
+ reg_size = UNITS_PER_FP_WORD;
+
+ else
+--
+1.8.4.2
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0061-Fix-for-unwinder-aborts-on-e500.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0061-Fix-for-unwinder-aborts-on-e500.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52ceb2c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0061-Fix-for-unwinder-aborts-on-e500.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+backport to fix the bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908 .
+
+ 2014-12-05 Olivier Hainque <hainque at adacore.com>
+
+ gcc/
+ * defaults.h: (DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN): Define default.
+ * dwarf2cfi.c (init_one_dwarf_reg_size): Honor
+ DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN.
+
+ libgcc/
+ * unwind-dw2.c (DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN): Remove default def,
+ now provided by defaults.h.
+
+ 2014-12-05 Olivier Hainque <hainque at adacore.com>
+
+ * dwarf2cfi.c (init_one_dwarf_reg_size): New helper, processing
+ one particular reg for expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes.
+ (expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes): Rework to use helper and
+ account for dwarf register spans.
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+Note: This patch though presents in upstream trunk, have not been back-ported to gcc-4_9-branch..
+
+---
+ gcc/defaults.h | 5 +++
+ gcc/dwarf2cfi.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
+ libgcc/unwind-dw2.c | 4 --
+ 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/gcc/defaults.h b/gcc/defaults.h
+index f94ae17..80a798f 100644
+--- a/gcc/defaults.h
++++ b/gcc/defaults.h
+@@ -438,6 +438,11 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If not, see
+ #define DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM(REG) DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER (REG)
+ #endif
+
++/* The mapping from dwarf CFA reg number to internal dwarf reg numbers. */
++#ifndef DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN
++#define DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN(REGNO) (REGNO)
++#endif
++
+ /* Map register numbers held in the call frame info that gcc has
+ collected using DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM to those that should be output in
+ .debug_frame and .eh_frame. */
+diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c b/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
+index 60e0308..55d4d2a 100644
+--- a/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
++++ b/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
+@@ -252,7 +252,60 @@ init_return_column_size (enum machine_mode mode, rtx mem, unsigned int c)
+ gen_int_mode (size, mode));
+ }
+
+-/* Generate code to initialize the register size table. */
++/* Datastructure used by expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes and
++ init_one_dwarf_reg_size to communicate on what has been done by the
++ latter. */
++
++typedef struct
++{
++ /* Whether the dwarf return column was initialized. */
++ bool wrote_return_column;
++
++ /* For each hard register REGNO, whether init_one_dwarf_reg_size
++ was given REGNO to process already. */
++ bool processed_regno [FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER];
++
++} init_one_dwarf_reg_state;
++
++/* Helper for expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes. Generate code to
++ initialize the dwarf register size table entry corresponding to register
++ REGNO in REGMODE. TABLE is the table base address, SLOTMODE is the mode to
++ use for the size entry to initialize, and INIT_STATE is the communication
++ datastructure conveying what we're doing to our caller. */
++
++static
++void init_one_dwarf_reg_size (int regno, machine_mode regmode,
++ rtx table, machine_mode slotmode,
++ init_one_dwarf_reg_state *init_state)
++{
++ const unsigned int dnum = DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM (regno);
++ const unsigned int rnum = DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT (dnum, 1);
++ const unsigned int dcol = DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN (rnum);
++
++ const HOST_WIDE_INT slotoffset = dcol * GET_MODE_SIZE (slotmode);
++ const HOST_WIDE_INT regsize = GET_MODE_SIZE (regmode);
++
++ init_state->processed_regno[regno] = true;
++
++ if (rnum >= DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS)
++ return;
++
++ if (dnum == DWARF_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN)
++ {
++ if (regmode == VOIDmode)
++ return;
++ init_state->wrote_return_column = true;
++ }
++
++ if (slotoffset < 0)
++ return;
++
++ emit_move_insn (adjust_address (table, slotmode, slotoffset),
++ gen_int_mode (regsize, slotmode));
++}
++
++/* Generate code to initialize the dwarf register size table located
++ at the provided ADDRESS. */
+
+ void
+ expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes (tree address)
+@@ -261,37 +314,41 @@ expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes (tree address)
+ enum machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (char_type_node);
+ rtx addr = expand_normal (address);
+ rtx mem = gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, addr);
+- bool wrote_return_column = false;
++
++ init_one_dwarf_reg_state init_state;
++ memset ((char *)&init_state, 0, sizeof (init_state));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i++)
+ {
+- unsigned int dnum = DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM (i);
+- unsigned int rnum = DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT (dnum, 1);
++ machine_mode save_mode;
++ rtx span;
+
+- if (rnum < DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS)
+- {
+- HOST_WIDE_INT offset = rnum * GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
+- enum machine_mode save_mode = reg_raw_mode[i];
+- HOST_WIDE_INT size;
++ /* No point in processing a register multiple times. This could happen
++ with register spans, e.g. when a reg is first processed as a piece of
++ a span, then as a register on its own later on. */
+
+- if (HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED (i, save_mode))
+- save_mode = choose_hard_reg_mode (i, 1, true);
+- if (dnum == DWARF_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN)
+- {
+- if (save_mode == VOIDmode)
+- continue;
+- wrote_return_column = true;
+- }
+- size = GET_MODE_SIZE (save_mode);
+- if (offset < 0)
+- continue;
++ if (init_state.processed_regno[i])
++ continue;
+
+- emit_move_insn (adjust_address (mem, mode, offset),
+- gen_int_mode (size, mode));
++ save_mode = reg_raw_mode[i];
++ if (HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED (i, save_mode))
++ save_mode = choose_hard_reg_mode (i, 1, true);
++
++ span = targetm.dwarf_register_span (gen_rtx_REG (save_mode, i));
++ if (!span)
++ init_one_dwarf_reg_size (i, save_mode, mem, mode, &init_state);
++ else
++ {
++ for (int si = 0; si < XVECLEN (span, 0); si++)
++ {
++ rtx reg = XVECEXP (span, 0, si);
++ init_one_dwarf_reg_size
++ (REGNO (reg), GET_MODE (reg), mem, mode, &init_state);
++ }
+ }
+ }
+
+- if (!wrote_return_column)
++ if (!init_state.wrote_return_column)
+ init_return_column_size (mode, mem, DWARF_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN);
+
+ #ifdef DWARF_ALT_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN
+diff --git a/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c b/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c
+index 55fc4bc..37f0ae2 100644
+--- a/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c
++++ b/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c
+@@ -55,10 +55,6 @@
+ #define PRE_GCC3_DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS
+ #endif
+
+-#ifndef DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN
+-#define DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN(REGNO) (REGNO)
+-#endif
+-
+ /* ??? For the public function interfaces, we tend to gcc_assert that the
+ column numbers are in range. For the dwarf2 unwind info this does happen,
+ although so far in a case that doesn't actually matter.
+--
+1.8.4.2
+
--
1.8.4.2
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list