[OE-core] [dizzy][PATCH] package.bbclass: Fix support for private libs
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Thu Jan 29 12:41:18 UTC 2015
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 05:12:13PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * n is a tuple since this commit:
> commit d3aa7668a9f001044d0a0f1ba2de425a36056102
> Author: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
> Date: Mon Jul 7 18:41:23 2014 +0100
> Subject package.bbclass: Improve shlibs needed data structure
>
> since then 'n in private_libs' was always false and private libs
> were always processed
> * this is bad when we have libfoo in private libs, but also some package
> providing libfoo, that way we ship own libfoo.so, but together with
> runtime dependency on package providing libfoo
ping
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/package.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> index 96d7fd9..4685cd2 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ python package_do_shlibs() {
> # /opt/abc/lib/libfoo.so.1 and contains /usr/bin/abc depending on system library libfoo.so.1
> # but skipping it is still better alternative than providing own
> # version and then adding runtime dependency for the same system library
> - if private_libs and n in private_libs:
> + if private_libs and n[0] in private_libs:
> bb.debug(2, '%s: Dependency %s covered by PRIVATE_LIBS' % (pkg, n[0]))
> continue
> if n[0] in shlib_provider.keys():
> --
> 2.2.1
>
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20150129/d29388f9/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list