[OE-core] [PATCH] security_flags: eliminate FORTIFY_SOURCE for debug builds

jackie.huang at windriver.com jackie.huang at windriver.com
Thu Jul 2 09:10:51 UTC 2015


From: Joe Slater <jslater at windriver.com>

If -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is included in CFLAGS for debug builds,
many warnings will be generated and some packages will fail to
build.  So, only conditionally include it.

Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater at windriver.com>
---
 meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
index 104a6cb..9dbce57 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
@@ -5,13 +5,18 @@
 # From a Yocto Project perspective, this file is included and tested
 # in the DISTRO="poky-lsb" configuration.
 
-SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-all -pie -fpie -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
-SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-all -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
+# _FORTIFY_SOURCE does not play well with debug builds
+#
+lcl_maybe_fortify = "${@base_conditional('DEBUG_BUILD','1','','-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2',d)}"
+
+SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-all -pie -fpie ${lcl_maybe_fortify}"
+SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-all ${lcl_maybe_fortify}"
+
 SECURITY_LDFLAGS ?= "-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now"
 SECURITY_X_LDFLAGS ?= "-Wl,-z,relro"
 
 # powerpc does not get on with pie for reasons not looked into as yet
-SECURITY_CFLAGS_powerpc = "-fstack-protector-all -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
+SECURITY_CFLAGS_powerpc = "-fstack-protector-all ${lcl_maybe_fortify}"
 # Deal with ppc specific linker failures when using the cflags
 SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-dbus_powerpc = ""
 SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-dbus-ptest_powerpc = ""
-- 
1.9.1




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list