[OE-core] [PATCH] oeqa/runtime: Added one runtime testcase in connman.
Daniel Istrate
daniel.alexandrux.istrate at intel.com
Wed Jul 15 14:35:34 UTC 2015
(testcase 223) Check that only one connmand runs in background.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Istrate <daniel.alexandrux.istrate at intel.com>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py
index cc537f7..b040400 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py
@@ -28,3 +28,26 @@ class ConnmanTest(oeRuntimeTest):
if status != 0:
print self.service_status("connman")
self.fail("No connmand process running")
+
+ @testcase(223)
+ def test_only_one_connmand_in_background(self):
+ """
+ Summary: Only one connmand in background
+ Expected: There will be only one connmand instance in background.
+ Product: BSPs
+ Author: Alexandru Georgescu <alexandru.c.georgescu at intel.com>
+ AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate <daniel.alexandrux.istrate at intel.com>
+ """
+
+ # Make sure that 'connmand' is running in background
+ (status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand')
+ self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find "connmand" process running in background.')
+
+ # Start a new instance of 'connmand'
+ (status, output) = self.target.run('connmand')
+ self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to start a new "connmand" process.')
+
+ # Make sure that only one 'connmand' is running in background
+ (status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand | wc -l')
+ self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find "connmand" process running in background.')
+ self.assertEqual(1, int(output), 'Found {} connmand processes running, expected 1.'.format(output))
--
2.1.4
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list