[OE-core] meta-gir issues and maintenance

Changhyeok Bae changhyeok.bae at lge.com
Fri Jun 5 01:42:03 UTC 2015


I start maintaining this layer some days ago.
So I only fix tested with g-ir & gir-test-image build.

I'll update gir version from 1.34.2 to latest stable version (more than 1.39.0 :)

Thanks for your reporting
-----Original Message-----
From: João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas [mailto:joaohf at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 10:53 AM
To: Changhyeok Bae
Cc: openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org; 이명구
Subject: Re: [OE-core] meta-gir issues and maintenance


Hi,

Using https://github.com/meta-gir/meta-gir and dizzy I got:

| checking for i586-poky-linux-pkg-config... (cached)
/srv/yocto/build/dizzy/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/pkg-config
| checking pkg-config is at least version 0.16... yes checking for 
| glib-compile-schemas...
/srv/yocto/build/dizzy/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/glib-compile-schemas
| checking for gobject-introspection... configure: error: You need to
have gobject-introspection >= 1.39.0 installed to build gtk+
| Configure failed. The contents of all config.log files follows to aid
debugging
| ERROR: oe_runconf failed
| WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command.
| ERROR: Function failed: do_configure (log file is located at
/srv/yocto/build/dizzy/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/gtk+3/3.12.2-r0/temp/log.do_configure.24043)
ERROR: Task 129
(/home/joaohf/opensource/poky/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+3_3.12.2.bb,
do_configure) failed with exit code '1'
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 2542 tasks of which 2464 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed.
Waiting for 0 running tasks to finish:

Summary: 1 task failed:
/home/joaohf/opensource/poky/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+3_3.12.2.bb,
do_configure
Summary: There was 1 WARNING message shown.
Summary: There was 1 ERROR message shown, returning a non-zero exit code.
joaohf at couve:/srv/yocto/build/dizzy$

My bblayers.conf was:

BBLAYERS ?= " \
   /home/joaohf/opensource/poky/meta \
   /home/joaohf/opensource/poky/meta-yocto \
   /home/joaohf/opensource/poky/meta-yocto-bsp \
   /home/joaohf/opensource/meta/meta-gir/meta-gir-core \
   /home/joaohf/opensource/meta/meta-gir/meta-gir \
   /home/joaohf/opensource/meta/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \
   "

Thanks.


On 02/06/2015 02:59, Changhyeok Bae wrote:
> Hi, I changed forked repo to https://github.com/meta-gir/meta-gir and changed some components matched with dizzy.
>
> Please test again with latest version.
>
> Thanks
> Changhyeok
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org 
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of 
> Joao Henrique Ferreira de Freitas
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 11:17 PM
> To: openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] meta-gir issues and maintenance
>
>
> Hi Changhyeok,
>
> Did you get this error when using meta-gir? In my case I am setting my recipe to inherit the g-ir class.
>
> | checking for python script directory... (cached)
> ${prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
> | checking for python extension module directory... (cached)
> ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
> | checking for python module thread... yes checking whether to enable 
> | threading in pygobject... yes
> |
> /srv/yocto/build/fido/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/python-pygobject/3.0.4-r0/pygobject-3.0.4/configure:
> line 15892: ./libtool: No such file or directory
> | checking for i586-poky-linux-pkg-config...
> /srv/yocto/build/fido/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/pkg-config
> | checking pkg-config is at least version 0.16... yes checking for 
> | GLIB
> | - version >= 2.24.0... cross compiling; assumed OK...
> | yes (version 2.42.1)
> | checking for ffi... checking for FFI... yes checking for GIO... yes 
> | checking for GI... no
> | configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.24.0
> |     gobject-introspection-1.0 >= 1.29.0
> | ) were not met:
> |
> | No package 'gobject-introspection-1.0' found
> |
> | Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you 
> | installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> |
> | Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GI_CFLAGS and 
> | GI_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> | See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> | Configure failed. The contents of all config.log files follows to 
> | aid
> debugging
> | ERROR: oe_runconf failed
> | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command.
> | ERROR: Function failed: do_configure (log file is located at
> /srv/yocto/build/fido/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/python-pygobject/3.0.4-
> r0/temp/log.do_configure.13915)
> ERROR: Task 233
> (/home/joaohf/opensource/meta/meta-gir/meta-gir/recipes-gir/python-pyg
> object/python-pygobject_3.0.4.bb,
> do_configure) failed with exit code '1'
> WARNING: QA Issue: libgirepository: configure was passed unrecognised
> options: --disable-schemas-install [unknown-configure-option]
> WARNING: QA Issue: g-ir-tools-native: configure was passed 
> unrecognised
> options: --disable-schemas-install [unknown-configure-option]
> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 2578 tasks of which 2524 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed.
> Waiting for 0 running tasks to finish:
>
> Summary: 1 task failed:
> /home/joaohf/opensource/meta/meta-gir/meta-gir/recipes-gir/python-pygo
> bject/python-pygobject_3.0.4.bb,
> do_configure
>
>
> I am working to build mypaint (http://mypaint.intilinux.com/) which is 
> hugely based on GI. Now I get lost.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 20/05/2015 21:06, Changhyeok Bae wrote:
>> I forked meta-gir to https://github.com/locust2001/meta-gir and start working from next week.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Müller [mailto:schnitzeltony at googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:46 PM
>> To: Burton, Ross
>> Cc: Changhyeok Bae; OE-core
>> Subject: Re: [OE-core] meta-gir issues and maintenance
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:
>>> On 18 May 2015 at 09:00, Andreas Müller 
>>> <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I would appreciate to have the gintrospection more central - this 
>>>> would give us a chance to get the gtk stuff out of stone age..
>>> Well, oe-core already has GTK+ 3, so we're "just" missing the 
>>> bindings to Python and JavaScript.
>> Sorry - I meant gnome not gtk.
>>> Changhyeok, you're welcome to fork meta-gir to your own repository 
>>> and work on it independently.  If you can update it so that it works 
>>> with oe-core master then you're the new maintainer. :)
>>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> This email has been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) 
>> http://www.yac.mx

This email has been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) http://www.yac.mx



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list