[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] systemd: split modules into packages

[Bottazzini, Bruno]

On Seg, 2015-03-09 at 08:32 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Mar 9, 2015, at 6:37 AM, Bottazzini, Bruno <bruno.bottazzini at intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sex, 2015-03-06 at 14:51 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Bottazzini, Bruno
> >> <bruno.bottazzini at intel.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sex, 2015-03-06 at 09:23 +0100, Anders Darander wrote:
> >>>> * Bottazzini, Bruno <bruno.bottazzini at intel.com> [150305 17:15]:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Qui, 2015-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Anders Darander wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>>> Just a quick question before I look into the patch in more detail.
> >>>> 
> >>>>>> Is the new setting of PACKAGECONFIG consistent with how systemd was
> >>>>>> built previously? I guess it is.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Hi Anders,
> >>>> 
> >>>>> it is consistent with how systemd was built previously. If you apply the
> >>>>> patch and bitbake it. Systemd will be built and shipped normally.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> But now it will give some options on how to customize it by excluding
> >>>>> packages you don't want to be with systemd.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Nice, I'm really liking this! That's something I've planned on doing
> >>>> myself for a while.
> >>>> 
> >>>>>> Another comment, you should remove the dependcies that gets added using
> >>>>>> PACKAGECONFIG from DEPENDS, e.g. acl etc. (Or are they required
> >>>>>> nevertheless?)
> >>>> 
> >>>>> You mean I should do the following ?
> >>>>> - PACKAGECONFIG[acl] = "--enable-acl,--disable-acl,acl"
> >>>>> + PACKAGECONFIG[acl] = "--enable-acl,--disable-acl"
> >>>> 
> >>>> No, I  meant to remove them from the long
> >>>> DEPENDS = "kmod docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-native intltool-native gperf-native acl readline dbus libcap libcgroup glib-2.0 qemu-native util-linux"
> >>>> line. (Unless I overlooked that part in your patch?)
> >>>> 
> >>>>> If I get what you said correctly, yes they are required.
> >>>> 
> >>>> What I meant, was thas unless e.g. acl is required even when building
> >>>> with --disable-acl, it's better to add the acl dependency in the
> >>>> PACKAGECONFIG like you to. Though, at the same time, remove acl from the
> >>>> long DEPENDS-line. (As otherwise we'll build acl anyway).
> >>> 
> >>> Anders,
> >>> 
> >>> You are right.
> >>> 
> >>> It is not needed to specify the libs on depends.
> >>> 
> >>> I have removed it and as soon as we review the whole patch I will send a
> >>> new version with this corrected
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> On top of all this 'acl' is a distro feature so that should be
> >> accounted for too.
> > 
> > Hello Khem,
> > 
> > It will be accounted when acl flag is enabled on systemd.
> > 
> 
> 
> I am saying enabling this packagconfig should depend upon distro features something like
> PACKAGECONFIG ??= "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', ‘acl', ‘acl', '', d)}

Alright, I got what you said and it looks good to me.

Next version will have it.

> 
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>