[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] libtirpc: respin patches

[Khem Raj]

> On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16 March 2015 at 18:24, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com <mailto:raj.khem at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Patches are fine in this series, however I just want to set the expectations right here. While having that libc-independent goal is fine.
> Sometimes we just can not do it, since uclibc or musl
> does not have all the features that glibc has and an app might also be using it.
> making glibc users not have those features is unfair
> given that we have a strong mechanism of overrides in OE, it should be used to this advantage.
> 
> But these patches, which add configure options to enable/disable the relevant functionality and have been sent upstream - represent the ideal case as once they're merged won't cost us any effort in the future.
> 

yes, you might have read the first line in my reply.

> Ross 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20150316/92c59a9f/attachment-0002.html>