[OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "oeqa/runtime: Added one runtime testcase in connman."

[Cristian Iorga]

connman daemon forks during normal usage,
so this test is no longer valid and generates
sometimes false positives.

This reverts commit 7d01c595c96eb3d67b90caf71050c4e9345257de.
---
 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py | 23 -----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py
index ee69e5d..bd9dba3 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py
@@ -29,26 +29,3 @@ class ConnmanTest(oeRuntimeTest):
         if status != 0:
             print self.service_status("connman")
             self.fail("No connmand process running")
-
-    @testcase(223)
-    def test_only_one_connmand_in_background(self):
-        """
-        Summary:     Only one connmand in background
-        Expected:    There will be only one connmand instance in background.
-        Product:     BSPs
-        Author:      Alexandru Georgescu <alexandru.c.georgescu at intel.com>
-        AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate <daniel.alexandrux.istrate at intel.com>
-        """
-
-        # Make sure that 'connmand' is running in background
-        (status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand')
-        self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find "connmand" process running in background.')
-
-        # Start a new instance of 'connmand'
-        (status, output) = self.target.run('connmand')
-        self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to start a new "connmand" process.')
-
-        # Make sure that only one 'connmand' is running in background
-        (status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand | wc -l')
-        self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find "connmand" process running in background.')
-        self.assertEqual(1, int(output), 'Found {} connmand processes running, expected 1.'.format(output))
-- 
2.1.4