[OE-core] [PATCH] bzip2: fix bunzip2 -qt returns 0 for corrupt archives

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Mon Oct 12 12:54:15 UTC 2015


On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 05:35 -0400, wenzong.fan at windriver.com wrote:
> From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan at windriver.com>
> 
> "bzip2 -t FILE" returns 2 if FILE exists, but is not a valid bzip2 file.
> "bzip2 -qt FILE" returns 0 when this happens, although it does print out
> an error message as is does so.
> 
> This has been fix by Debian, just port changes from Debian patch file
> "20-legacy.patch":
> 
> * Fixed "bunzip2 -qt returns 0 for corrupt archives" (Closes: #279025).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan at windriver.com>
> ---
>  ...bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb         |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..63d705d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +From 8068659388127e8e63f2d2297ba2348c72b20705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan at windriver.com>
> +Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:19:51 -0400
> +Subject: [PATCH] bzip2: fix bunzip2 -qt returns 0 for corrupt archives
> +
> +"bzip2 -t FILE" returns 2 if FILE exists, but is not a valid bzip2 file.
> +"bzip2 -qt FILE" returns 0 when this happens, although it does print out
> +an error message as is does so.
> +
> +This has been fix by Debian, just port changes from Debian patch file
> +"20-legacy.patch":
> +
> +* Fixed "bunzip2 -qt returns 0 for corrupt archives" (Closes: #279025).
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Backport [Debian]
> +

What is the upstream position on this issue? That they won't fix it? I'm
not sure Backport is right for a debian patch since debian is not the
bzip2 upstream.

Cheers,

Richard




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list