[OE-core] Policy for 'Pending' patches (was Re: [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close)

[Khem Raj]

> On Sep 10, 2015, at 5:12 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10 September 2015 at 13:12, Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com <mailto:gary at mlbassoc.com>> wrote:
> What would you do to the poor sod that sends a patch upstream
> (i.e. Pending) that is not being moved on by the upstream holders?
> Punish him by making his patch (and potentially all others he
> has created) invalid?  Seems a bit harsh...
> 
> Send upstream is Upstream-Status: Submitted.
> 
> Pending means "I wrote a patch but cannot be bothered to send it upstream”.

Or more politely, I am working on upstreaming it on my own schedule.

> 
> Ross 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20150910/6651b6bd/attachment-0002.html>