[OE-core] [PATCH][jethro] binutils: backport bug fix to the 2.25 branch for jethro
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Fri Apr 29 20:47:22 UTC 2016
this is ok to install.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
<tristan.vanberkom at codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> We fail to build webkit on aarch64 due to this binutils bug:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
>
> Applying patch which fixes this, stripped out changelog entry
> from patch to make it apply without error.
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc | 1 +
> ...plying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-internal-error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc
> index f3817fa..c7db9e0 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
> file://0015-Fix-dynamic-list-so-that-symbols-not-in-the-list-are.patch \
> file://binutils-octeon3.patch \
> file://add-thunderx-support-for-gas.patch \
> + file://fix-internal-error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch \
> "
> S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-internal-error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-internal-error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..df9d54c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-internal-error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
> +From d21f123b0ead1806416cf0dafae12bec4cca8920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail.com>
> +Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:57:44 -0800
> +Subject: [PATCH] Fix internal error when applying TLSDESC relocations with no TLS segment.
> +
> +gold/
> + PR gold/19353
> + * aarch64.cc (Target_aarch64::relocate_tls): Don't insist that
> + we have a TLS segment for GD-to-IE optimization.
> + * i386.cc (Target_i386::tls_gd_to_ie): Remove tls_segment parameter.
> + Adjust all calls.
> + (Target_i386::tls_desc_gd_to_ie): Likewise.
> + (Target_i386::relocate_tls): Don't insist that we have a TLS segment
> + for TLSDESC GD-to-IE optimizations.
> + * x86_64.cc (Target_x86_64::tls_gd_to_ie): Remove tls_segment parameter.
> + Adjust all calls.
> + (Target_x86_64::tls_desc_gd_to_ie): Likewise.
> + (Target_x86_64::relocate_tls): Don't insist that we have a TLS segment
> + for TLSDESC GD-to-IE optimizations.
> +---
> + gold/aarch64.cc | 6 ------
> + gold/i386.cc | 14 ++------------
> + gold/x86_64.cc | 14 ++------------
> + 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/gold/aarch64.cc b/gold/aarch64.cc
> +index 20f2f4f..5ad061b 100644
> +--- a/gold/aarch64.cc
> ++++ b/gold/aarch64.cc
> +@@ -7422,12 +7422,6 @@ Target_aarch64<size, big_endian>::Relocate::relocate_tls(
> + }
> + if (tlsopt == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> + {
> +- if (tls_segment == NULL)
> +- {
> +- gold_assert(parameters->errors()->error_count() > 0
> +- || issue_undefined_symbol_error(gsym));
> +- return aarch64_reloc_funcs::STATUS_BAD_RELOC;
> +- }
> + return tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, target, rela, r_type,
> + view, psymval, got_entry_address,
> + address);
> +diff --git a/gold/i386.cc b/gold/i386.cc
> +index 82886d4..a7168a8 100644
> +--- a/gold/i386.cc
> ++++ b/gold/i386.cc
> +@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ class Target_i386 : public Sized_target<32, false>
> + // Do a TLS General-Dynamic to Initial-Exec transition.
> + inline void
> + tls_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<32, false>*, size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment* tls_segment,
> + const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>&, unsigned int r_type,
> + elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Addr value,
> + unsigned char* view,
> +@@ -687,7 +686,6 @@ class Target_i386 : public Sized_target<32, false>
> + // transition.
> + inline void
> + tls_desc_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<32, false>*, size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment* tls_segment,
> + const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>&, unsigned int r_type,
> + elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Addr value,
> + unsigned char* view,
> +@@ -3054,7 +3052,7 @@ Target_i386::Relocate::relocate_tls(const Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> + }
> + if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> + {
> +- this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, tls_segment, rel, r_type,
> ++ this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, rel, r_type,
> + got_offset, view, view_size);
> + break;
> + }
> +@@ -3116,13 +3114,7 @@ Target_i386::Relocate::relocate_tls(const Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> + }
> + if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> + {
> +- if (tls_segment == NULL)
> +- {
> +- gold_assert(parameters->errors()->error_count() > 0
> +- || issue_undefined_symbol_error(gsym));
> +- return;
> +- }
> +- this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, tls_segment, rel, r_type,
> ++ this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, rel, r_type,
> + got_offset, view, view_size);
> + break;
> + }
> +@@ -3354,7 +3346,6 @@ Target_i386::Relocate::tls_gd_to_le(const Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> + inline void
> + Target_i386::Relocate::tls_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> + size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment*,
> + const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>& rel,
> + unsigned int,
> + elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Addr value,
> +@@ -3449,7 +3440,6 @@ inline void
> + Target_i386::Relocate::tls_desc_gd_to_ie(
> + const Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> + size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment*,
> + const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>& rel,
> + unsigned int r_type,
> + elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Addr value,
> +diff --git a/gold/x86_64.cc b/gold/x86_64.cc
> +index 3cfc064..4ad5afc 100644
> +--- a/gold/x86_64.cc
> ++++ b/gold/x86_64.cc
> +@@ -816,7 +816,6 @@ class Target_x86_64 : public Sized_target<size, false>
> + // Do a TLS General-Dynamic to Initial-Exec transition.
> + inline void
> + tls_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<size, false>*, size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment* tls_segment,
> + const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>&, unsigned int r_type,
> + typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr value,
> + unsigned char* view,
> +@@ -835,7 +834,6 @@ class Target_x86_64 : public Sized_target<size, false>
> + // Do a TLSDESC-style General-Dynamic to Initial-Exec transition.
> + inline void
> + tls_desc_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<size, false>*, size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment* tls_segment,
> + const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>&, unsigned int r_type,
> + typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr value,
> + unsigned char* view,
> +@@ -3733,7 +3731,7 @@ Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::relocate_tls(
> + if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> + {
> + value = target->got_plt_section()->address() + got_offset;
> +- this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, tls_segment, rela, r_type,
> ++ this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, rela, r_type,
> + value, view, address, view_size);
> + break;
> + }
> +@@ -3800,14 +3798,8 @@ Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::relocate_tls(
> + }
> + if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> + {
> +- if (tls_segment == NULL)
> +- {
> +- gold_assert(parameters->errors()->error_count() > 0
> +- || issue_undefined_symbol_error(gsym));
> +- return;
> +- }
> + value = target->got_plt_section()->address() + got_offset;
> +- this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, tls_segment,
> ++ this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum,
> + rela, r_type, value, view, address,
> + view_size);
> + break;
> +@@ -3973,7 +3965,6 @@ inline void
> + Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::tls_gd_to_ie(
> + const Relocate_info<size, false>* relinfo,
> + size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment*,
> + const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>& rela,
> + unsigned int,
> + typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr value,
> +@@ -4085,7 +4076,6 @@ inline void
> + Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::tls_desc_gd_to_ie(
> + const Relocate_info<size, false>* relinfo,
> + size_t relnum,
> +- Output_segment*,
> + const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>& rela,
> + unsigned int r_type,
> + typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr value,
> +--
> +1.7.1
> +
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list