[OE-core] [PATCH] To make yocto-spdx support spdx2.0 SPEC

[Lei, Maohui]

Hi all

I want to know if anyone maintains the spdx module(spdx.bbclass)?
If nobody is maintaining it, I want to know if I can do it. 

Best regards
Lei


> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Lei, Maohui
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:14 AM
> To: openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] To make yocto-spdx support spdx2.0 SPEC
> 
> Ping.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lei, Maohui
> > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 8:12 AM
> > To: openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> > Cc: Lei, Maohui
> > Subject: [OE-core][PATCH] To make yocto-spdx support spdx2.0 SPEC
> >
> > There are some problems in spdx module(spdx.bbclass).
> > 1. The newest version of spdxi specification is 2.0. But even spdx
> > 1.1,
> > yocto+SPDX can't support well.
> > 2. It is complex to build a Yocto+SPDX environment.
> > 3. Creating a spdx file spends too much time, especially for large
> > software.
> >
> > To improve spdx module ,I change the spdx create tool from fossology
> > to dosocs2.
> > With this patch:
> > 1. Also gets license informations by scanner from fossology.
> > 1. Can support SPDX2.0 SPEC.
> > 2. Because dosocs2 can work on directories, so there is no necessary
> > to pack source code before do_spdx. It can save time for large
> software.
> >
> > Lei Maohui (1):
> >   To Make yocto-spdx support spdx v2.0 specification.
> >
> >  meta/classes/spdx.bbclass | 488
> > +++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > --------
> >  meta/conf/licenses.conf   |  67 +------
> >  2 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 371 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> 
> 
> 
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core