[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] security_flags: pass ssp-buffer-size param to stack protector

[Joshua Lock]

This tells the compiler to use a canary to protect any function which
declares a character array of 4 or more bytes on its stack, rather
than the default of 8 or more bytes.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock at intel.com>
---
 meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
index 77fade6..691cea1 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ lcl_maybe_fortify = "${@base_conditional('DEBUG_BUILD','1','','-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
 # Error on use of format strings that represent possible security problems
 SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT ?= "-Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security"
 
-SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong -pie -fpie ${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
-SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong ${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
+SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong --param ssp-buffer-size=4 -pie -fpie ${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
+SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong --param ssp-buffer-size=4 ${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
 
 SECURITY_LDFLAGS ?= "-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now"
 SECURITY_X_LDFLAGS ?= "-Wl,-z,relro"
-- 
2.7.4