[OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: Update to final 6.2.0 release

[Martin Jansa]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:29:27PM +0200, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2016-08-23 14:13, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > On 08/23/2016 04:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> -#BASEURI ?= "${GNU_MIRROR}/gcc/gcc-${PV}/gcc-${PV}.tar.bz2"
> >> +BASEURI ?= "${GNU_MIRROR}/gcc/gcc-${PV}/gcc-${PV}.tar.bz2"
> >>  #SRCREV = "bd9a826d5448db11d29d2ec5884e7e679066f140"
> >>  #BASEURI ?= "git://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc;branch=gcc-6-branch;protocol=git"
> >> -BASEURI ?= "ftp://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.2.0-RC-20160815/gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815.tar.bz2"
> >> +#BASEURI ?= "ftp://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.2.0-RC-20160815/gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815.tar.bz2"
> >> -S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/gcc-${PV}${SNAP}"
> >> +S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/gcc-${PV}"
> >>  #S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/git"
> >>  B = "${WORKDIR}/gcc-${PV}/build.${HOST_SYS}.${TARGET_SYS}"
> >
> > The commented out lines should be dropped, they're just clutter.
> 
> Also, how "final" is it when the URL points to a "xxx-RC-yyy"?  Seems
> a bit premature...

If you read it a bit more carefully you'll notice that it doesn't point
to "xxx-RC-yyy"?

Only your reply was a bit premature :).

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160823/aed8f6ac/attachment-0002.sig>