[OE-core] [PATCH] insane: Add SH4 musl mapping to the QA arch tests

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz at mleia.com> wrote:
> Hello Khem,
>
> On 12/09/2016 03:29 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 6, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz at mleia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This change allows to pass QA for packages built with sh4-oe-linux-musl
>>> toolchain, the problem is reproted while building core-image-minimal target:
>>>
>>>  ERROR: readline-7.0-r0 do_package_qa:
>>>  Error executing a python function in exec_python_func() autogenerated
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz at mleia.com>
>>> ---
>>> meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
>>> index 5ddb87b..01494e3 100644
>>> --- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
>>> +++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
>>> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ def package_qa_get_machine_dict(d):
>>>                         "microblaze":  (189,     0,    0,          False,         32),
>>>                         "microblazeeb":(189,     0,    0,          False,         32),
>>>                         "microblazeel":(189,     0,    0,          True,          32),
>>> +                        "sh4":        (  42,     0,    0,          True,          32),
>>
>> Can you also add sh4eb as well while you are at it ?
>>
>
> I don't build or do runtime testing of sh4eb, and you may notice that
> there is no any other sh4eb target in the file at the moment. I'll try
> to find some time in the future and test sh4eb linux, linux-musl and
> linux-uclibc toolchains and add all of them together as a distinct
> change.
>
> Since missing sh4 linux-musl hits me immediately, I would like to ask
> you to apply the change as is.
>

OK, I think thats fine, I was hoping that you were testing that too

> Thank you.
>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir