[OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

[Burton, Ross]

Hi,

On 5 February 2016 at 20:55, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne at linaro.org>
wrote:

> > Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to switch it for
> > another alternative would be useful.
>
> sure. but, then I have some questions..
>
> 1. which one we default to? openssl?
>
> 2. which one we support, from configure.ac:
>
>         [choose SHA1 implementation])])
> case "x$with_sha1" in
> x | xlibc | xlibmd | xlibnettle | xlibgcrypt | xlibcrypto | xlibsha1 |
> xCommonCrypto | xCryptoAPI)
>   ;;
>

nettle / gcrypt / crypto are all in oe-core.  I presume that's BSD's "throw
it all in" libc.

nettle seems nice and low down the stack and modern.


> 3. is there a good way to handle 'multiple choice' with PACKAGECONFIG?
> How can we prevent more than 1 PACKAGECONFIG to be set (nicely)?


With a comment saying "pick one of these", and nothing in the disabled case.

Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160205/f920bbea/attachment-0002.html>