[OE-core] [PATCHv2][RFC] arch-armv7ve.inc: respect armv7a override as well

[Martin Jansa]

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:24:36AM -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > * in all cases we currently have we consider armv7ve to be compatible with armv7a
> 
> Is this a short term workaround or a long term solution?

It's just RFC for discussion.

> If it's a long term solution then how will armv7m and armv7r be
> handled? They are likely to need to duplicate a lot of the current
> armv7a over-rides too.

armv7a and armv7ve are much closer than armv7a and armv7m or armv7r as
Khem said in earlier discussion. And maybe it's because fewer people use
armv7[rm], but currently these 2 aren't used anywhere as overrides (in
layers I've in world builds).

> Maybe adding a generic "armv7" over-ride which can be enabled by all
> armv7 variants is a better option?

Maybe, but that will change how armv7r and armv7m are currently built, I
cannot say if for better or worse, I don't use either.

> Either way, I'd like to continue cleaning up of the existing armv7a
> over-rides (e.g. the libav armv7a specific optimisation is likely
> bogus and should be removed, etc).
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
> > index 79e1ef6..d0fdff7 100644
> > --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
> > +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
> > @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv7ve"
> >  TUNEVALID[armv7ve] = "Enable instructions for ARMv7ve"
> >  TUNECONFLICTS[armv7ve] = "armv4 armv5 armv6 armv7 armv7a"
> >  TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', ' -march=armv7ve', '', d)}"
> > -MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', 'armv7ve:', '' ,d)}"
> > +# In all cases we currently have we consider armv7ve to be compatible with armv7a
> > +MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', 'armv7ve:armv7a:', '' ,d)}"
> >
> >  require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
> >  require conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-neon.inc
> > --
> > 2.7.0
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160108/70d37f73/attachment-0002.sig>